|
Should we go ahead and put stationary bikes in all the spacecraft,
space station and Lunar Bases?
Recently the concept came
up in an online think tank
when one member suggested
that we hook them up to charge
batteries too. Then a debate
erupted over all this and
it was called a hair-brained
idea. One member then stated;
“I never said that exercise
was useless or unwanted, I
merely pointed out that the
crew's exercise energy is
a "drop in the bucket". My
purpose was to point out just
how much energy a human is
"worth".” Incorrect as his
immediate goal as exhibited
was to shoot down the idea
and belittle the concept designer?
Looks like a revenge thing
as people disrespected often
want revenge, that is human
nature one supposes. But it
also asks on the Forum at
the top that; “humans are
not allowed please!” He exhibited
human behavior on the think
tank site? We are past that.
Prior to this the combative
behavioral problematic youth
stated; “Reality rears its
ugly head again, spewing red-hot
truth to vaporize the delusions
of fools.” So any one reading
this would assume that only
a delusional fool would attempt
to capture energy from a stationary
bike? http://www.econvergence.net/electro.htm
http://www.whynot.net/view_idea?id=372
http://www.whynot.net/view_idea?id=1089
http://www.middlebury.edu/NR/rdonlyres/22DC37FE-9FA5-4EF5-92F0-379D97DB0BF5/0/pedalgenerator.pdf
This is from MIT: http://web.media.mit.edu/~nathan/nepal/research/research.html#Generators
I guess your next email is
to MIT to tell them that they
are a bunch of morons too
and have no business making
stuff like this because it
is not reality based? Yah
right? You see so often humans
who pretend to be brilliant
so often have problems due
to their combativeness and
miss understanding of the
problem you see. Consider
all this in 2006. "Lance Winslow"
- Online Think Tank forum
board. If you have innovative
thoughts and unique perspectives,
come think with Lance; http://www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/
|
